George Russell and Valtteri Bottas crash: Stewards deliver verdict and rule neither driver was at fault
Imola stewards explain what happened in the acrimonious crash and why neither Valtteri Bottas nor George Russell was at fault for causing the accident which dramatically put both cars out of the race
Sunday 18 April 2021 22:36, UK
Valtteri Bottas and George Russell's high-speed collision has been ruled as a 'racing incident' by stewards at the Emilia Romagna GP, with neither driver found at fault.
The drivers blamed each other for causing the lap-32 crash at the Tamburello corner which put them both out of the race as they fought over ninth place.
Williams' Russell said the Mercedes driver had driven "dangerously" by making a slight move to the right as he attempted to overtake on the outside, while Bottas suggested the accident was "completely" the Englishman's fault.
- What the drivers and pundits said about Bottas-Russell crash
- Imola race report: Verstappen wins ahead of Hamilton comeback
- Latest championship standings
But the stewards saw it neither of those ways and took no further action on Sunday night, ruling that "at no time did either car manoeuvre erratically"
So what did the stewards say?
Car 63 [Russell] approached car 77 [Bottas] to pass after the front straight a few laps after the restart when DRS had recently been enabled.
Trending
- Transfer Centre LIVE! 'Only a matter of time before Trent leaves for Madrid'
- Van Gerwen slams Wright: 'He talks so much nonsense'
- Papers: Zirkzee eyed by Juventus, Trippier set for Toon exit
- Liverpool reject approach for Alexander-Arnold from Real Madrid
- Arteta on title bid: If Liverpool slip, we'll be there
- Nev and Carra's teams of the season so far and 2025 predictions
- World Darts Championship schedule: Littler vs Aspinall on New Year's Day
- Why have so many of the Golden Generation struggled in management?
- West Ham latest: Antonio leaves hospital: I'll be back soon
- Amorim admits Man Utd are in a relegation fight
Car 77 maintained his line throughout the incident along the right hand side of the dry line, leaving at least a full car's width to the right at all times.
Car 63 approached with a significant speed advantage. He moved to pass on the right. As the cars approached the kink of turn 1, the gap between them and the righthand side of the track decreased. At no time did either car manoeuvre erratically.
The track appeared to be not especially wet through turn 1 but at the point of closest approach to the right hand side of the track, the right hand side tyres of Car 63 hit an especially damp patch and the car snap yawed, bearing in mind that the car had low downforce in the rear with the DRS open.
The Stewards conclude that the accident was a racing incident considering the conditions and take no further action.